Abstract

The combination of renewable energy sources and prosumer-based smart grid is a sustainable solution to cater to the problem of energy demand management. A pressing need is to develop an efficient Energy Management Model (EMM) that integrates renewable energy sources with smart grids. However, the variable scenarios and constraints make this a complex problem. Machine Learning (ML) methods can often model complex and non-linear data better than the statistical models. Therefore, developing an ML algorithm for the EMM is a suitable option as it reduces the complexity of the EMM by developing a single trained model to predict the performance parameters of EMM for multiple scenarios. However, understanding latent correlations and developing trust in highly complex ML models for designing EMM within the stochastic prosumer-based smart grid is still a challenging task. Therefore, this paper integrates ML and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) in the EMM. At the first stage, an optimization model for Prosumer Energy Surplus (PES), Prosumer Energy Cost (PEC), and Grid Revenue (GR) is formulated to calculate base performance parameters (PES, PEC, and GR) for the training of the ML-based GPR model. In the second stage, stochasticity of renewable energy sources, load, and energy price, same as provided by the Genetic Algorithm (GA) based optimization model for PES, PEC, and GR, and base performance parameters act as input covariates to produce a GPR model that predicts PES, PEC, and GR. Seasonal variations of PES, PEC, and GR are incorporated to remove hitches from seasonal dynamics of prosumers energy generation and prosumers energy consumption. The proposed adaptive Service Level Agreement (SLA) between energy prosumers and the grid benefits both these entities. The results of the proposed model are rigorously compared with conventional optimization (GA and PSO) based EMM to prove the validity of the proposed model.

Highlights

  • WORK To conclude, predicted responses of Machine Learning (ML)-based Energy Management Model (EMM) are compared with outcomes of Optimization-based EMM in terms of Prosumer Energy Surplus (PES), Prosumer Energy Cost (PEC), and Grid Revenue (GR)

  • ML-based EMM results in 29% more PES, 46% less PEC, and 27% more GR for ED1 while 5% more PES, 11% less PEC, and 6% more GR for ED2 and 30% more PES, 11% less PEC, and 31% more GR for ED3

  • ML-based EMM results in 26% increased PES, 42% decreased PEC, and 33% increased GR for ED1 while 38% more PES, 17% less PEC, and 5% more GR for ED2 and 31% more PES, 11% less PEC, and 30% more GR for ED3

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The above works are successful in modeling and analyzing the EMMs for prosumers and smart grids, they still have not developed a comprehensive, ML-based EMM that incorporates important features of EMM, such as Smart Contracts (SCs) to stream-line demand-supply management and a well-defined Service Level Agreements (SLAs) between smart grid and prosumers. Due to the ability of the ML algorithms to learn multiple formulations and measures from data, such as intermittent of renewable power generation, plug and play facilities, prosumer activities, and complex power system formulations both in online and offline modes, an EMM is developed for mutual energy trade between smart grid and EDs. The output parameters considered for the EMM are prosumer energy surplus (PES), prosumer energy cost (PEC), and grid revenue GR) to increase the mutual benefits of smart grids and EDs. The optimization algorithms tested for the above-stated purpose are the Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). GPR based EMM designed to estimate response parameters (PES, PEC, GR); Section 5 details performance validation including data analysis, seasonal variations of PES, PEC, and GR, statistical analysis, and tabular analysis, and Section 6 concludes the paper

ENERGY MANAGEMENT MODEL FOR SMART GRID AND ENERGY DISTRICTS
GAUSSIAN ENERGY DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS OF PROSUMERS
GENETIC ALGORITHM FOR OPTIMIZATION
SEASONAL VARIATIONS OF EMM PARAMETERS
Findings
CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call