Abstract
AbstractPredicting the crystal structure is essential to address the reliance on serendipity for facilitating the discovery and design of high‐performance high‐entropy oxides (HEOs). Here, three classic algorithms‐based machine learning models to predict the crystal structure of HEOs are successfully established and analyzed by combining five metrics, and the XGBoost classifier shows excellent accuracy and robustness with ACC and F1 scores up to 0.977 and 0.975, respectively. SHAP summary plot indicates that the anion‐to‐cation radius ratio (rA/rC) has the greatest impact on crystal structure, followed by difference in Pauling and Mulliken electronegativities (ΔχPauling and ΔχMulliken). It is noteworthy that the rA/rC, ΔχPauling, and ΔχMulliken lower than 0.35, 0.1, and 0.2, respectively, tend to lead to a fluorite crystal structure, whereas rock‐salt and spinel crystal structures are always formed. This work is expected to facilitate the discovery and design of HEOs with tailorable crystal structures and properties.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.