Abstract

Rain microstructure parameters assessed by disdrometers are commonly used to classify rain into convective and stratiform. However, different types of disdrometer result in different values for these parameters. This in turn potentially deteriorates the quality of rain type classifications. Thies disdrometer measurements at two sites in Bavaria in southern Germany were combined with cloud observations to construct a set of clear convective and stratiform intervals. This reference dataset was used to study the performance of classification methods from the literature based on the rain microstructure. We also explored the possibility of improving the performance of these methods by tuning the decision boundary. We further identified highly discriminant rain microstructure parameters and used these parameters in five machine-learning classification models. Our results confirm the potential of achieving high classification performance by applying the concepts of machine learning compared to already available methods. Machine-learning classification methods provide a concrete and flexible procedure that is applicable regardless of the geographical location or the device. The suggested procedure for classifying rain types is recommended prior to studying rain microstructure variability or any attempts at improving radar estimations of rain intensity.

Highlights

  • Different precipitation droplet growth mechanisms lead to the different properties of convective and stratiform rain [1,2,3]

  • A simple and widely used rain classification method was proposed by Bringi et al [9], where a threshold of the rain intensity and its standard deviation over 10 successive minutes are used to separate convective and stratiform intervals

  • We suggest classifying rain events into clearly defined convective, stratiform, and mixed events based on the pattern of successive interval rain type classes produced by this method

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Different precipitation droplet growth mechanisms lead to the different properties of convective and stratiform rain [1,2,3]. This is due to the vertical development of convective clouds in contrast to the more horizontal development of stratiform clouds [4]. Llasat [10] classified rain using a rain intensity threshold for different time intervals Such methods are prone to misclassification [11]; they are applicable independent of the instrument type. Another classification approach is based on cloud observations [12,13,14]. Other methods rely on Atmosphere 2019, 10, 251; doi:10.3390/atmos10050251 www.mdpi.com/journal/atmosphere

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.