Abstract

Determination of in-situ stresses is essential for subsurface planning and modeling, such as horizontal well planning and hydraulic fracture design. In-situ stresses consist of overburden stress (σv), minimum (σh), and maximum (σH) horizontal stresses. The σh and σH are difficult to determine, whereas the overburden stress can be determined directly from the density logs. The σh and σH can be estimated either from borehole injection tests or theoretical finite elements methods. However, these methods are complex, expensive, or need unavailable tectonic stress data. This study aims to apply different machine learning (ML) techniques, specifically, random forest (RF), functional network (FN), and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), to predict the σh and σH using well-log data. The logging data includes gamma-ray (GR) log, formation bulk density (RHOB) log, compressional (DTC), and shear (DTS) wave transit-time log. A dataset of 2307 points from two wells (Well-1 and Well-2) was used to build the different ML models. The Well-1 data was used in training and testing the models, and the Well-2 data was used to validate the developed models. The obtained results show the capability of the three ML models to predict accurately the σh and σH using the well-log data. Comparing the results of RF, ANFIS, and FN models for minimum horizontal stress prediction showed that ANFIS outperforms the other two models with a correlation coefficient (R) for the validation dataset of 0.96 compared to 0.91 and 0.88 for RF, and FN, respectively. The three models showed similar results for predicting maximum horizontal stress with R values higher than 0.98 and an average absolute percentage error (AAPE) less than 0.3%. a20 index for the actual versus the predicted data showed that the three ML techniques were able to predict the horizontal stresses with a deviation less than 20% from the actual data. For the validation dataset, the RF, ANFIS, and FN models were able to capture all changes in the σh and σH trends with depth and accurately predict the σh and σH values. The outcomes of this study confirm the robust capability of ML to predict σh and σH from readily available logging data with no need for additional costs or site investigation.

Highlights

  • Determination of in-situ stresses is essential for subsurface planning and modeling, such as horizontal well planning and hydraulic fracture design

  • In-situ stresses are presented in overburden stress, and horizontal stresses, named minimum and maximum horizontal stresses

  • A horizontal gas well drilled in the direction of the σh direction of Marcellus shale has a 40–50% increase in productivity compared to a 45° off-azimuth well

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Determination of in-situ stresses is essential for subsurface planning and modeling, such as horizontal well planning and hydraulic fracture design. List of symbols AAPE Average absolute percentage error ANFIS Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system ANN Artificial neural network DFIT Diagnostic fracture injection test DTC Compressional waves transit time, μs/ft DTS Shear waves transit time, μs/ft FN Functional network FNFSM Functional network forward-selection method FNESM Functional network exhaustive-search method FNBEM Functional network backward-elimination method FNFBM Functional network forward–backward method FNBFM Functional network backward-forward method GR Gamma-ray, API LOT Leak-off test N The number of data points ML Machine learning. A comprehensive geomechanical model of downhole formations helps address many issues through different stages of reservoir life An example of these issues are maintaining borehole stability in drilling operations, formation instability within the production operations and sand production, and the applicable wellbore completion design s­ election[5,6,7,8,9,10]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.