Abstract

Optimization of extrusion-based bioprinting (EBB) parameters have been systematically conducted through experimentation. However, the process is time- and resource-intensive and not easily translatable to other laboratories. This study approaches EBB parameter optimization through machine learning (ML) models trained using data collected from the published literature. We investigated regression-based and classification-based ML models and their abilities to predict printing outcomes of cell viability and filament diameter for cell-containing alginate and gelatin composite bioinks. In addition, we interrogated if regression-based models can predict suitable extrusion pressure given the desired cell viability when keeping other experimental parameters constant. We also compared models trained across data from general literature to models trained across data from one literature source that utilized alginate and gelatin bioinks. The results indicate that models trained on large amounts of data can impart physical trends on cell viability, filament diameter, and extrusion pressure seen in past literature. Regression models trained on the larger dataset also predict cell viability closer to experimental values for material concentration combinations not seen in training data of the single-paper-based regression models. While the best performing classification models for cell viability can achieve an average prediction accuracy of 70%, the cell viability predictions remained constant despite altering input parameter combinations. Our trained models on bioprinting literature data show the potential usage of applying ML models to bioprinting experimental design.

Highlights

  • Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is a bottom-up fabrication approach to create tissue-mimetic structures through the precise deposition of biomaterials

  • A datasets of 617 instances corresponding to a unique cell viability value and a dataset with 339 instances corresponding to a unique filament diameter value were collected from 75 extrusion-based bioprinting (EBB) papers found through the search terms TS = Extrusion AND

  • Compared to other machine learning (ML) models created for bioprinting predictions, the regression models created in this study provided lower R2 values and comparable errors with a similar proportion of training data to test data, and the accuracy of the classification models were lower as well [12,15]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is a bottom-up fabrication approach to create tissue-mimetic structures through the precise deposition of biomaterials. When live cells are embedded within the biomaterials used, a combination of material parameters and printer settings impact the cells’ viability when extruded, including nozzle outlet diameter, material concentration, and operating temperature. These parameters affect the ability of the biomaterials to produce precise geometries, known as printability. The optimization of EBB parameters has been mainly conducted through systematic wet-lab experimentation.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call