Abstract
Omic data analysis is steadily growing as a driver of basic and applied molecular biology research. Core to the interpretation of complex and heterogeneous biological phenotypes are computational approaches in the fields of statistics and machine learning. In parallel, constraint-based metabolic modeling has established itself as the main tool to investigate large-scale relationships between genotype, phenotype, and environment. The development and application of these methodological frameworks have occurred independently for the most part, whereas the potential of their integration for biological, biomedical, and biotechnological research is less known. Here, we describe how machine learning and constraint-based modeling can be combined, reviewing recent works at the intersection of both domains and discussing the mathematical and practical aspects involved. We overlap systematic classifications from both frameworks, making them accessible to nonexperts. Finally, we delineate potential future scenarios, propose new joint theoretical frameworks, and suggest concrete points of investigation for this joint subfield. A multiview approach merging experimental and knowledge-driven omic data through machine learning methods can incorporate key mechanistic information in an otherwise biologically-agnostic learning process.
Highlights
Today, the search for biological mechanisms at molecular scale can leverage an unprecedented amount of information
We show that mining and integrating experimental and genome-scale metabolic models (GSMMs)-generated multiomic data with machine learning techniques can unveil unknown mechanisms in a sample-specific manner, identifying relevant targets for biotechnology and biomedicine
The use of machine and deep learning in computational and systems biology will keep growing in parallel with the rapid advancement of high-throughput omic technologies
Summary
Citation: Zampieri G, Vijayakumar S, Yaneske E, Angione C (2019) Machine and deep learning meet genome-scale metabolic modeling. PLoS Comput Biol 15(7): e1007084. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pcbi.1007084 Funding: CA received funding from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), grants CBMNet-PoC-D0156 and NPRONET- BIV-015 (BB/L013754/1) (URLs: https://bbsrc.ukri.org/; http://www.cbmnetnibb.net/ ; https://npronet.com/). GZ and CA were also supported by the "Health and wellbeing" grand challenge at Teesside University (URL: https:// www.tees.ac.uk/sections/research/healthwellbeing/ index.cfm). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.