Abstract
Despite the importance of Machiavellianism, no study has examined the basic issue of its latent status: Is Machiavellianism a dimensional or a categorical construct? Or equivalently, do people differ in the extent to which they are Machiavellian, or do Machiavellianists differ categorically from non-Machiavellianists? To answer these questions, we analyzed two large online samples of N1=10,918 participants who completed the MACH-IV questionnaire and N2=40,265 participants who completed the Machiavellianism subscale of the Dirty Dozen questionnaire. Via taxometric methods, we found that Machiavellianism encompasses quantitative rather than qualitative differences in both samples. Hence, people differ quantitatively to the extent to which they are Machiavellian. These findings have important practical and theoretical implications regarding assessment, classification, causality, and labeling.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
