Abstract

Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) appear to be robustly risk-seeking in computerized gambling tasks typically used for electrophysiology. This behavior distinguishes them from many other animals, which are risk-averse, albeit measured in more naturalistic contexts. We wondered whether macaques’ risk preferences reflect their evolutionary history or derive from the less naturalistic elements of task design associated with the demands of physiological recording. We assessed macaques’ risk attitudes in a task that is somewhat more naturalistic than many that have previously been used: subjects foraged at four feeding stations in a large enclosure. Patches (i.e., stations), provided either stochastically or non-stochastically depleting rewards. Subjects’ patch residence times were longer at safe than at risky stations, indicating a preference for safe options. This preference was not attributable to a win-stay-lose-shift heuristic and reversed as the environmental richness increased. These findings highlight the lability of risk attitudes in macaques and support the hypothesis that the ecological validity of a task can influence the expression of risk preference.

Highlights

  • Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) appear to be robustly risk-seeking in computerized gambling tasks typically used for electrophysiology

  • The majority of data on macaque risk preference comes from studies tailored to the needs of electrophysiology, not cross-species comparison

  • Our results demonstrate the effect of the environmental structure on the expression of risk attitudes in rhesus macaques and highlight the importance of using naturalistic tasks for studying cognitive processes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) appear to be robustly risk-seeking in computerized gambling tasks typically used for electrophysiology This behavior distinguishes them from many other animals, which are risk-averse, albeit measured in more naturalistic contexts. Subjects’ patch residence times were longer at safe than at risky stations, indicating a preference for safe options This preference was not attributable to a win-staylose-shift heuristic and reversed as the environmental richness increased. One type of explanation assumes that macaques’ risk attitudes are an evolved reflection of their foraging history This view is supported by observed patterns of risk-seeking in primate species across a variety of experimental methods[41,42,43,44]. Even humans can become risk-seeking when gambling for small rewards in conditions designed to be similar to those used in non-human primate experiments[34,45]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call