Abstract

TRACE model of Maanshan Nuclear Power Plant (three-loop PWR) was used to analyze Loss of Flow transient as defined in FSAR Chapter 15. The results were compared with those from RETRAN02 and LOFTRAN/THINC licensing analysis of Westinghouse Inc. Three different initiation events were involved in this analysis: Partial Loss of Flow (PLOF), Complete Loss of Flow-Under Voltage (CLOF-UV) and Complete Loss of Flow-Under Frequency (CLOF-UF). This paper compared important thermal hydraulic parameters at steady state, such as the pressure of pressurizer, cold-leg temperature, and the pressure of steam generator, etc.. It also compared system parameters under transient conditions, such as core thermal power, core flow rate, and pressure of pressurizer, etc.. It is concluded that the steady state results of TRACE calculations are in general good agreements with those from RETRAN02 and have a largest error of 3.03% in the steam generator flow. For transient condition, TRACE results are also comparable with those from LOFTRAN and RETRAN02. In summary, our studies show that Maanshan TRACE model is correct and accurate enough for future safety analysis applications.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call