Abstract

In this paper, we examine the two assumptions of the Bayesian personalized ranking (BPR), a well-known pair-wise method for one-class collaborative filtering (OCCF): (1) a user with the same degree of negative preferences for all her unrated items; and (2) a user always preferring her rated items to all her unrated items. We claim that (A1) and (A2) cause recommendation errors because they do not always hold in practice. To address these problems, we first define fine-grained multi-type pair-wise preferences (PPs), which are more sophisticated than the single-type PP used in BPR. Then, we propose a novel pair-wise approach called M-BPR, which exploits multi-type PPs together in learning users’ more detailed preferences. Furthermore, we refine M-BPR by employing the concept of item groups to reduce the uncertainty of a user’s a single item-level preference. Through extensive experiments using four real-life datasets, we demonstrate that our approach addresses the problems of the original BPR effectively and also outperforms seven state-of-the-art OCCF (i.e., four pair-wise and three point-wise) methods significantly.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.