Abstract

This brief Article discusses Lynch v. Donnelly, where the Court, addressing for the first time the constitutionality of a governmental display of a religious symbol, held that a city did not violate the Establishment Clause by including a creche in its annual Christmas display. With this ruling, the Court shifted its Establishment Clause jurisprudence away from a strict separation approach that had been articulated in Everson v. Board of Education and later incorporated into Lemon v. Kurtzman. A vital ingredient in the Lynch legacy is Justice O’Connor’s concurrence, in which she proposed a new Establishment Clause test. Justice O’Connor’s endorsement test suggested that a governmental accommodation of religion would not violate the First Amendment unless the government intends or is perceived to endorse religion.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call