Abstract

To appraise the methodological quality of the Italian pharmacoeconomic models. In most of the developed countries the institution of HTA agencies has been one of the major concerns in order to support the decisions for reimbursement of new drugs. Italy is experiencing a remarkable lack in this field. 18 Italian models published between 1998 and 2005 selected using EMBASE and MEDLINE search engines. Inclusion criteria: (a) Italian nationality of the first author, (b) Italian baseline population. Studies were appraised using the checklist developed by Philips et al. (2004). Although the alternatives and the basic framework of the pharmacoeconomic models are usually well defined and specified, the studies present a lack of data about treatment effects, utilities, analysis of uncertainty, considerations about heterogeneity and generalisability of results. Despite the high level of competence of the authors, the pharmacoeconomic models quality is largely affected by the scarce interest of Italian institutions for the use of ICER-based criteria, in favour of a price-minimization one. The institutional use of ICER-based criteria should be strongly recommended for a rational resource use in healthcare.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.