Luteinizing hormone–releasing hormone antagonists in prostate cancer

Abstract

Luteinizing hormone–releasing hormone (LHRH) antagonists work by directly inhibiting LHRH without any initial stimulation of the LHRH receptor. The physiologic response is a direct and rapid decrease in luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and testosterone without any flare. Although there has been extensive basic-science work on these medications, practical shortcomings have limited clinical studies in prostate cancer. Many of these compounds induce significant histamine-mediated side effects, and until recently, no depot form existed. In 2 recent phase-3 studies comparing abarelix depot with leuprolide and with leuprolide plus bicalutamide, abarelix lowered serum testosterone more quickly. None of the 89 patients on leuprolide alone were castrate on day 8 as opposed to 72% of the 180 patients randomized to abarelix ( P <0.001). Similarly, none of the combination group were castrate by day 8, whereas 68% of the abarelix patients were castrate ( P <0.001). In addition, 82% of the patients treated with leuprolide and 86% of those given leuprolide/bicalutamide had testosterone surge, whereas none of the abarelix patients did ( P <0.001 for both studies). Both phase 2 and phase 3 data show abarelix to be well tolerated. In conclusion, LHRH antagonists offer the physiologic response of orchiectomy without surgery. These medications are well tolerated and a depot form now exists. The expansion of indications for androgen deprivation, such as downsizing or intermittent therapy, could provide many opportunities for their use. Despite these encouraging advances, however, their routine use for advanced prostate cancer may depend on demonstration of a survival advantage in avoiding flare.