Abstract

There has been dramatic resurgence of interest in surgical treatment of emphysema, particularly "lung volume reduction" procedures. Recent studies have demonstrated improvements in pulmonary function, lung mechanics, exercise tolerance, and quality of life in selected patients following volume reduction procedures. However, considerable uncertainty remains regarding overall benefit, optimal patient selection, operative techniques, and duration of response. This summarizes current approaches to lung volume reduction surgery, available clinical outcome information, selection criteria, and physiologic mechanisms of response, and discusses the potential role for surgical volume reduction in treatment of emphysema. Recent data appear to support the efficacy of bilateral staple lung volume reduction surgery in patients with severe symptomatic heterogeneously distributed emphysema. Further studies will be needed to determine relative value of different operative techniques and benefit in patients with other clinical presentations.

Highlights

  • Free b eam laser treatment resulted in greater improvement in FEV1 than contact tip laser (18% vs 13%), it was still not as effective as unilateral staple procedures

  • Because both unilateral and bilateral lung volume reduction can a chieve many of the goals of surgical treatment of emphysema, McKenna et al[52] analyzed

  • Available data suggest that standard operation at this time for a patient with severe heterogeneous emphysema should be bilateral staple lung volume reduction procedures performed by either median sternotomy or video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS)

Read more

Summary

Evaluation of Patients for LVRS

The goal of the preoperative assessment process is to select patients with severely symptomatic disease who may benefit from surgery with an acceptable surgical risk. Routine evaluation for LVRS includes a complete medical history, physical examination, and other anatomic and physiologic evaluations. An algorithm describing this selection process used at Washington Universi~ Medical Center in St. Louis is shown in Figure 1.3 Some of the most important points in the decision tree are as follows: (1) predom-

Methods
Results of the Evaluation Process
Summary
J Emphysema predominant
Results

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.