Abstract

The aim is to describe lung ultrasound (LUS) findings in a cohort of patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) and compare them with computed tomography (CT) and chest x-ray (CXR) findings in order to evaluate the potentiality of LUS in TB diagnosis. In this prospective study, 82 subjects with suspected TB were enrolled after being evaluated with CXR and chest CT. LUS was performed by blinded radiologists within 3days after admission. A semiquantitative index was used: score 1 (lesions that extend for about 1-15% of the affected zone), score 2 (15-40%) and score 3 (40-100%). Microbiological analysis confirmed TB diagnosis in 58/82 (70.7%). CT was positive in all patients, LUS in 79/82 (96.3%) CXR in 78/82 (95.1%) and adding LUS and CXR in 100%. In PTB patients we found a great number of lungs zones with micronodules and with total findings than non-TPB patients (p < 0.05). Overall LUS sensitivity was 80%, greater for micronodules (82%) and nodules (95%), lower for consolidation with air bronchogram (72%) and cavitations (33%). We reported 5 complicated pleural effusion at LUS, only 1 in CT. CXR overall sensitivity was 81%. Adding CXR and LUS findings we reported a sensitivity of 90%. LUS could be considered a valid, non-invasive and cost-effective diagnostic tool especially in world regions where CT were not available, also in addiction with CXR. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of our University Hospital (rif. CEAVC 14,816).

Highlights

  • Nowadays, tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of death from a single infectious agent, greater even than HIV/AIDS

  • computed tomography (CT) was positive in all patients, lung ultrasound (LUS) in 79/82 (96,3%) chest x-ray (CXR) in 78/82 (95,1%) and adding LUS and CXR in 100%

  • In pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) patients we found a great number of lungs zones with micronodules and with total findings than non-TPB patients (p

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of death from a single infectious agent, greater even than HIV/AIDS. Chest X-ray (CXR) has always been one of the main methods of imaging in the diagnosis of TB This technique has high sensitivity but poor specificity [5]. To the best of our knowledge, there are some studies about specific LUS findings in PTB and there are not any comparative studies between different imaging techniques [12,13,14,15,16]. The aim is to describe lung ultrasound (LUS) findings in a cohort of patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) and compare them with computed tomography (CT) and chest x-ray (CXR) findings in order to evaluate the potentiality of LUS in TB diagnosis

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.