Abstract
Interstitial lung disease (ILD) has been reported to have a poor outcome following lung transplantation due to difficulties getting ill recipients to transplantation and challenging early postoperative outcomes. To assess long-term outcomes for this cohort, we performed a retrospective 18-year chart review of all ILD lung transplant recipients. ILD single (SLT) and bilateral sequential lung transplantations (BSLT) were compared with all other lung transplant patients and International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Registry data over the same time period. Of 585 lung transplantations, 90 (15%) were ILD (53 SLT, 37 BSLT); 67 (74%) were idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), 9 (10%) were sarcoidosis, 9 (10%) were lymphangioleiomyomatosis, and 5 (6%) had other indications. Mean age was 52 years (range, 34–69 years). Actuarial survival at 1, 5, 10, 15, and 18 years compared favorably to all other lung transplantations performed (77% vs 83%, 51% vs 50%, 42% vs 26%, 28% vs 17%, and 28% vs 8%, respectively). IPF actuarial survival at 1, 5, and 10 years appeared superior to ISHLT Registry data (76% vs 72%, 50% vs 44%, and 34% vs 20%, respectively). There was equivocal survival between SLT and BSLT at 1, 5, and 10 years (78% vs 68%, 49% vs 50%, and 29% vs 50%, respectively). Our ILD figures compared favorably to lung transplantation for other diseases and international standards, while survival from SLT was as successful as BSLT both in the short and the longer term. Consideration should be given to utilizing SLT to maximize the allocation of donor lungs and to decrease waiting list mortality associated with IPF.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.