Abstract
IntroductionAs lung transplant candidates are older with increased comorbidities, we sought to examine the prevalence and outcomes of lung transplant recipients after prior cardiac surgery. MethodsLung transplants were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Database. Patients were stratified based on prior cardiac surgery (No Surgery [NS], Prior coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG], Prior Valve [Valve]). Unadjusted comparisons were performed amongst all groups, and propensity matching was utilized for adjusted comparisons. Survival was examined with Kaplan-Meier methods. Results28,710 patients were identified, 467 (1.6%) had prior CABG and 84 (0.3%) had prior valvular surgery. Prior to matching, the NS group was significantly younger, less commonly male, and had lower lung allocation scores. There were significantly fewer bilateral lung transplants in the CABG and Valve groups. Length of stay was shortest in the CABG group, but there were no significant differences in postoperative stroke, dialysis, or in-hospital mortality. There was an increased incidence of cardiac/cerebrovascular cause of death in CABG recipients (18.3%) and malignancy death in Valve recipients (23.3%). Following matching, CABG 5-year survival was lower than NS (p<0.01), while there was no significant difference between NS and Valve groups (p=0.4). ConclusionsCABG and Valve recipients had decreased survival, however not at levels prohibitive to transplantation. Due to potentially increased risk of cardiovascular mortality, providers should evaluate the burden of vascular disease in potential recipients with prior CABG to improve patient selection and maximize post-transplant survival.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.