Abstract

BackgroundAtelectasis after cardiac surgery is common and promotes ventilation/perfusion mismatch, infection, and delayed discharge from critical care. Recruitment manoeuvres are often performed to reduce atelectasis. In severe respiratory failure, recruitment manoeuvres in the prone position may increase oxygenation, survival, or both. We compared the effects of recruitment manoeuvres in the prone vs supine position on lung aeration and oxygenation in cardiac surgical patients. MethodsSubjects were randomised to recruitment manoeuvres (40 cm H2O peak inspiratory pressure and 20 cm H2O PEEP for 30 s) in either the prone or supine position after uncomplicated cardiac surgery. The co-primary endpoints were lung aeration (end-expiratory lung volume measured by electrical impedance tomography (arbitrary units [a.u.]) and lung oxygenation (ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen [Pao2/FiO2 ratio]). Secondary outcomes included postoperative oxygen requirement and adverse events. ResultsThirty subjects (27% female; age, 48–81 yr) were recruited. Dorsal lung tidal volume was higher after prone recruitment manoeuvres (363 a.u.; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 283–443; n=15) after extubation, compared with supine recruitment manoeuvres (212 a.u.; 95% CI, 170–254; n=15; P<0.001). Prone recruitment manoeuvres increased dorsal end-expiratory lung volume by 724 a.u. (95% CI, 456–992) after extubation, compared with 163 a.u. decrease (95% CI, 73–252) after supine recruitment manoeuvres (P<0.001). The Pao2/FiO2 ratio after extubation was higher after prone recruitment manoeuvres (46.6; 95% CI, 40.7–53.0) compared with supine recruitment manoeuvres (39.3; 95% CI, 34.8–43.8; P=0.04). Oxygen therapy after extubation was shorter after prone (33 h [13]) vs supine recruitment manoeuvres (52 h [22]; P=0.01). No adverse events occurred. ConclusionsRecruitment manoeuvres in the prone position after cardiac surgery improve lung aeration and oxygenation. Clinical trial registrationNCT03009331.

Highlights

  • Atelectasis after cardiac surgery is common and promotes ventilation/perfusion mismatch, infection, and delayed discharge from critical care

  • Our RCT found that an early postoperative recruitment manoeuvres (RMs) in the prone position was superior to supine RM, as assessed by recruitment of dorsal atelectatic areas, dorsal redistribution of VT, and improved lung oxygenation

  • The beneficial effect of prone RM remained after extubation and presumably until the second postoperative day, as suggested by the shorter duration of postoperative oxygen supplementation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Atelectasis after cardiac surgery is common and promotes ventilation/perfusion mismatch, infection, and delayed discharge from critical care. We compared the effects of recruitment manoeuvres in the prone vs supine position on lung aeration and oxygenation in cardiac surgical patients. Methods: Subjects were randomised to recruitment manoeuvres (40 cm H2O peak inspiratory pressure and 20 cm H2O PEEP for 30 s) in either the prone or supine position after uncomplicated cardiac surgery. Dorsal lung tidal volume was higher after prone recruitment manoeuvres (363 a.u.; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 283e443; n1⁄415) after extubation, compared with supine recruitment manoeuvres (212 a.u.; 95% CI, 170e254; n1⁄415; P

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call