Abstract

Lung cancer continues to be one of the most common cancers in Canada, with approximately 28,400 new cases diagnosed each year. Although timely care can contribute substantially to quality of life for patients, it remains unclear whether it also improves patient outcomes. In this work, we used a set of quality indicators that aim to describe the quality of care in lung cancer patients. We assessed adherence with existing guidelines for timeliness of lung cancer care and concordance with existing standards of treatment, and we examined the association between timeliness of care and lung cancer survival. Patients with lung cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 were identified from the Pulmonary Division Lung Cancer Registry at our centre. We demonstrated that the interdisciplinary pulmonary oncology service successfully treated most of its patients within the recommended wait times. However, there is still work to be done to decrease variation in wait time. Our results demonstrate a significant association between wait time and survival, supporting the need for clinicians to optimize the patient care trajectory. It would be helpful for Canadian clinicians treating patients with lung cancer to have wait time guidelines for all treatment modalities, together with standard definitions for all time intervals. Any reductions in wait times should be balanced against the need for thorough investigation before initiating treatment. We believe that our unique model of care leads to an acceleration of diagnostic steps. Avoiding any delay associated with referral to a medical oncologist for treatment could be an acceptable strategy with respect to reducing wait time.

Highlights

  • Lung cancer is one of most common cancers in Canada, with 28,400 new cases diagnosed each year[1]

  • Our results demonstrate a significant association between wait time and survival, supporting the need for clinicians to optimize the patient care trajectory

  • Interpretation It would be helpful for Canadian clinicians treating patients with lung cancer to have wait time guidelines for all treatment modalities, together with standard definitions for all time intervals

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Lung cancer is one of most common cancers in Canada, with 28,400 new cases diagnosed each year[1]. The 5-year survival rate for lung cancer is 17%1. Various guidelines to establish standards for timely care for patients with known or suspected lung cancer have been published, but prompt access to and delivery of lung cancer care can be difficult to achieve in a public health care system. Timely care can contribute substantially to quality of life and emotional well-being for patients, the literature concerning the effect of timeliness on other patient outcomes does not show a clear association between earlier initiation of anticancer treatment and improved survival[11,12,13,14]. Lung cancer continues to be one of the most common cancers in Canada, with approximately 28,400 new cases diagnosed each year. We assessed adherence with existing guidelines for timeliness of lung cancer care and concordance with existing standards of treatment, and we examined the association between timeliness of care and lung cancer survival

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.