Abstract

Here we investigate the use of optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) for dating cobbles from the body of successive beach ridges and compare cobble surface‐derived ages to standard quartz OSL ages from sand. Between four and eight cobbles and sand samples (age control) were dated with the luminescence method, taken from the modern beach and from beach ridges on the south and north extremes of a prograding spit on the westernmost coast of Lolland, Denmark. Luminescence‐depth profiles perpendicular to the surfaces of the cobbles show that the feldspar infrared signals stimulated at 50 °C were fully reset to various depths into the cobbles prior to final deposition; as a result, the equivalent doses determined from close to the surface of such cobbles can be used to calculate burial ages. Beach‐ridge burial ages given by the average of ages of individual cobbles taken from the same site are consistent, within errors, with the ages derived from the sand samples. Cobble‐ and sand‐derived ages show that the southernmost beach ridge at Albuen was formed around 2 ka ago, indicating that this sandy spit is younger than other coastal systems in Denmark. The agreement between ages derived from clasts and from standard quartz OSL in this study confirms that, even in the absence of sandy sediments, we can reliably date sites using OSL by targeting larger clasts. In addition, the record of prior light exposure contained in the shape of the cobbles’ luminescence‐depth profile removes one of the major uncertainties (i.e. the degree of signal reset prior to burial) in the luminescence dating of high latitude sites.

Highlights

  • We investigate the use of optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) for dating cobbles from the body of successive beach ridges and compare cobble surface-derived ages to standard quartz OSL ages from sand

  • We first assess the degree of bleaching, and compare the cobble burial ageswith those based on the OSL from sandsized quartz extracted from the material surrounding the cobbles

  • Cobble ages are within errors, in agreement with respective quartz OSL ages from the sandy material surrounding the rocks despite (i) the significant scatter in De estimates of aliquots from the same cobble surface, (ii) age estimates based on an assumed grain size (400 lm), and (iii) high fading correction factors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We investigate the use of optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) for dating cobbles from the body of successive beach ridges and compare cobble surface-derived ages to standard quartz OSL ages from sand. Simms et al 2011, 2018; Sohbati et al 2011, 2015; Simkins et al 2013) These studies relied on the exposure of the clast surface to daylight, and the resulting resetting of the latent luminescence to some depth into the clast interior. Freiesleben et al 2015; Sohbati et al 2015; Jenkins et al 2018) This is a major advantage compared to sediment dating using sand-sized grains, which do not record such information. We first assess the degree of bleaching, and compare the cobble burial ageswith those based on the OSL from sandsized quartz extracted from the material surrounding the cobbles

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call