Abstract
BackgroundDiagnosing extraspinal sciatica and pudendal neuralgia remains a clinical challenge. MRI and MR Neurography (MRN) are currently the standard techniques used to support the diagnosis of extraspinal lumbosacral plexus entrapments; however, for the intrapelvic portions of the lumbosacral plexus their accuracy is still limited. MR Tractography (MRT) feasibility to image the lumbosacral plexus has been demosntrated, but its clinical applications have yet to be determined. PurposeTo correlate MRT with intraoperative findings in patients undergoing laparoscopic treatment of intrapelvic entrapments of the lumbosacral plexus and compare its accuracy with Neuropelveological clinical assessment and MRN. Materials and methodsThis is a retrospective analysis of MRT reconstructions of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) sequences acquired for the MRN collected from a cohort of 13 patients undergoing laparoscopic detrapment of the lumbosacral plexus. The primary outcome of this study was the correlation of MRT reconstruction with intraoperative findings. Secondary outcomes included the correlation of MRN, preoperative Neuropelveological clinical diagnoses and the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) fractional anisotropy (FA) and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) in patients undergoing pelvic MRI and MRN for the investigation of intrapelvic nerve entrapments. ResultsMRT correlated with intraoperative findings in 11 of 13 patients (85%). Neuropelveological clinical assessment was able to accurately diagnose a pelvic nerve entrapment in 12/13 patients (92%) and MRN agreed with surgical findings in only 2/13 (15%) patients. MRT was significantly superior to MRN (p < 0.001). FA and ADC did not correlate with the identification of a nerve entrapment, likely due to limitations regarding the placement of the seedpoints. ConclusionsThis initial, retrospective analysis, suggests that MRT is superior to MRN at diagnosing intrapelvic entrapments of the lumbosacral plexus. A prospective, double-blinded study is underway to validate this data, but these initial findings show great potential for MRT as a diagnostic tool for extraspinal sciatica and pudendal neuralgia.Clinical Trials Registry: U1111–1261-4910 (REBEC – Brazilian Registry for Clinical Trials).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.