Abstract
The chemiluminescent superoxide indicators lucigenin and coelenterazine were compared in rat liver submitochondrial particles and cytoplasmic membranes from Paracoccus denitrificans. Qualitative monitoring is possible with both probes, but quantitative work with lucigenin is hampered by its dependence on one-electron reduction before the photon-emitting reaction. Therefore, calibration of measurements on complex I, capable of efficient lucigenin prereduction with reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, against xanthine oxidase, which in the presence of hypoxanthine is not able to reduce the probe to a significant rate compared to complex I, may give results in error by one order of magnitude. Coelenterazine, although susceptible of storage-dependent high background chemiluminescence, does not require prereduction and is thus a more reliable probe.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
