Abstract

An error by the author in comparing Luce's choice axiom with choice‐reaction data is here corrected. After a brief description of the experiment, a likelihood‐ratio procedure is developed and the data re‐analysed, with attention to why the present analysis corrects the previous error. The axiom appears inconsistent with these data, possibly because the set of stimuli used had a natural physical structure. This result is consistent with other psychophysical studies and is germane to the bounds of applicability of the choice axiom.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call