Abstract
An error by the author in comparing Luce's choice axiom with choice‐reaction data is here corrected. After a brief description of the experiment, a likelihood‐ratio procedure is developed and the data re‐analysed, with attention to why the present analysis corrects the previous error. The axiom appears inconsistent with these data, possibly because the set of stimuli used had a natural physical structure. This result is consistent with other psychophysical studies and is germane to the bounds of applicability of the choice axiom.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
