Abstract
To the Editor: The final conclusion of the recently published article1 on lubeluzole treatment of acute ischemic stroke, that “treatment with lubeluzole within 6 hours of the onset of ischemic stroke resulted in improved clinical outcome at three months with no safety concerns,” may not result from the data presented and the way they were analyzed. The primary aim of this trial was to test the null hypothesis that treatment with lubeluzole results in outcome similar in terms of death at 3 months to placebo treatment. As the primary end points “all deaths” showed no statistically significant difference between groups, the null hypothesis cannot be rejected. The fact that the number of deaths were (not statistically significant) lower in the lubeluzole group may well be due to chance because of small numbers or to differences in baseline characteristics; fewer males and fewer patients with various types of cardiac disease in the lubeluzole-treated group may have favored better outcome in the treatment group. From the analysis description, adjustments for these differences cannot be inferred. Secondly, fewer patients …
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.