Abstract
Whereas gray-scale morphology has been formally interpreted in the context of fuzzy sets, heretofore there has not been developed a truly fuzzy mathematical morphology. Specifically, mathematical morphology is based on the notion of fitting, and rather than simply characterize standard morphological fitting in fuzzy terms, a true fuzzy morphology must characterize fuzzy fittings. Moreover, it should preserve the nuances of both mathematical morphology and fuzzy sets. In the present paper, we introduce a framework that satisfies these criteria. In contrast to the unusual binary or gray-scale morphology, herein erosion measures the degree to which one image is beneath (which is a subset type relation) another image, and it does so by employing an index for set inclusion. The result is a quite different `fitting' paradigm. Based on this new fitting approach, we define erosion, dilation, opening, and closing. The true fuzziness of the theory can be seen in a number of ways, one being that the dilation does not commute with union. (The commutativity lies at the heart of nonfuzzy lattice-based mathematical morphology.) However, we do arrive at a counterpart of Matheron's Representation Theorem for increasing translation-invariant mappings.© (1992) COPYRIGHT SPIE--The International Society for Optical Engineering. Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.