Abstract

In this article, I explore the concept of Ubuntu in a context of caregiving with the aim of deconstructing the gendering of caregiving in a context of pastoral care. Using a qualitative approach, this article draws from the empirical findings of primeval praxis of Ubuntu from a study conducted on the KwaZulu-Natal chapter of South Africa’s National Research Foundation (NRF) funded ‘Archaeology of Ubuntu’ project. Empirical findings were evaluated through African women theology. Findings of this article highlight that Ubuntu in a context of caregiving is not exclusively feminine because men also display strong tendencies of care in African traditional communities. This suggests that pastoral care in an African context should not be gendered because findings of the article confirm that the Zulu elders from KwaZulu-Natal generally linked Ubuntu to communal care where men and women partnered in extending caregiving to those in need.Intradisciplinary and/or interdisciplinary implications: Although the article is written from a socio-anthropological perspective, it integrates African traditional presumptions of gender and care ethics that are significant in extending pastoral care by reviewing literature from sociology, anthropology, gender, feminist studies, practical theology and systematic theology.

Highlights

  • Ubuntu has become synonymous with care ethics

  • The main purpose of this article is to explore how the elderly members of the community from Kwa-Zulu Natal (KZN) Province conceptualised the philosophy of Ubuntu in a context of caregiving

  • There is no homogeneity in Africa, the Ubuntu philosophy suggests some form of a homogeneous culture in southern Africa

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ubuntu has become synonymous with care ethics. The main purpose of this article is to explore how the elderly members of the community from Kwa-Zulu Natal (KZN) Province conceptualised the philosophy of Ubuntu in a context of caregiving. Published research on Ubuntu (Hall, Du Toit & Louw 2013; Letseka 2012; Mangena 2009) highlights the gendered stereotyping of Ubuntu. Those who research on Ubuntu and gender seem to be attributing Ubuntu to a philosophy that enforces patriarchy in African communities (Du Toit 2011; Mangena 2009; Manyonganise 2015). The gender fairness nature of the Ubuntu philosophy is not clear because gender research highlights mainly its patriarchal values. The gender inclusiveness of Ubuntu in caregiving is concealed, where care is assumed to be an ethic that is visible from women rather than men. Held (2005) defines care as a practice and a value that is extended by caring persons who are motivated to care and participate in effective practices of care but are compelled by moral salience of attending to and meeting the needs of the particular others for whom they take responsibility

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call