Abstract

In the domain of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data analysis, given two correlation matrices between regions of interest (ROIs) for the same subject, it is important to reveal relatively large differences to ensure accurate interpretation. However, clustering results based only on differences tend to be unsatisfactory and interpreting the features tends to be difficult because the differences likely suffer from noise. Therefore, to overcome these problems, we propose a new approach for dimensional reduction clustering. Methods: Our proposed dimensional reduction clustering approach consists of low-rank approximation and a clustering algorithm. The low-rank matrix, which reflects the difference, is estimated from the inner product of the difference matrix, not only from the difference. In addition, the low-rank matrix is calculated based on the majorize–minimization (MM) algorithm such that the difference is bounded within the range −1 to 1. For the clustering process, ordinal k-means is applied to the estimated low-rank matrix, which emphasizes the clustering structure. Results: Numerical simulations show that, compared with other approaches that are based only on differences, the proposed method provides superior performance in recovering the true clustering structure. Moreover, as demonstrated through a real-data example of brain activity measured via fMRI during the performance of a working memory task, the proposed method can visually provide interpretable community structures consisting of well-known brain functional networks, which can be associated with the human working memory system. Conclusions: The proposed dimensional reduction clustering approach is a very useful tool for revealing and interpreting the differences between correlation matrices, even when the true differences tend to be relatively small.

Highlights

  • The neural basis of the human cognitive system is studied using noninvasive neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging, electroencephalography (EEG), and functional near-infrared spectroscopy [1,2,3,4].In particular, for investigating the complex and distinctive functional network structure of the human brain and its nervous system [5,6], functional connectivity analysis, which examines the temporal synchronization between brain regions (e.g., [7]), is gaining popularity in this field

  • The purpose of this example is to detect clustering structures where the difference between two experimental conditions, i.e., High-working memory (WM) and Low-WM tasks, is emphasized. The features of these estimated clusters are interpreted in combination with knowledge on regions of interest (ROIs) related to WM, including the task-positive network (TPN), ventral attention network (VAN), salience network (SN), visual network (VN), and default mode network (DMN)

  • The TPN consists of the fronto-parietal network (FPN), dorsal attention network (DAN), and cingulo-opercular network (CON)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The neural basis of the human cognitive system is studied using noninvasive neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), electroencephalography (EEG), and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) [1,2,3,4].In particular, for investigating the complex and distinctive functional network structure of the human brain and its nervous system [5,6], functional connectivity analysis, which examines the temporal synchronization between brain regions (e.g., [7]), is gaining popularity in this field. Functional connectivity between specific regions of interest (ROIs) is usually compared among various subjects or experimental conditions. Recent studies have revealed that the community structures of functional connectivity networks differ between schizophrenic individuals and healthy controls [8] and during the performance of different cognitive tasks [9]. We focus on situations in which correlation matrices between ROIs are calculated for each subject in two different conditions. In such situations, it is important to reveal subnetworks of ROIs such that the differences between conditions are relatively large

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.