Abstract

ObjectivesTo compare objective and subjective image quality between low keV virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) of the excretory phase and conventional venous phase images derived from spectral dual-energy CT (DECT) in the assessment of urothelial carcinoma. Methods26 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed urothelial carcinoma who received clinically indicated venous- and excretory phase abdominal CT scans were included retrospectively. Attenuation, image noise as well as signal- and contrast-to-noise-ratio (SNR, CNR) in venous and excretory phase CT and excretory phase VMI from 40 to 70 keV were obtained from ROI-based measurements in the following regions: urothelial carcinoma, liver, pancreas, renal cortex, subcutaneous fat, renal vein/artery, portal vein, urinary bladder wall, lymph nodes, prostate/uterus. Subjective vessel contrast and delineation of primary tumor manifestations and distant metastases were rated on 5-point Likert scales. ResultsIn comparison to venous phase CT, attenuation and SNR in excretory phase VMI40keV were higher (p < 0.001), except for liver parenchyma, where they were comparable (p = 0.07 and p = 0.17, respectively). Regarding image noise, no significant difference was found between venous phase CT and excretory phase VMI40keV (p-range: 0.08–1.00), except for liver, portal vein and renal artery, where it was lower in VMI40keV (p < 0.05). CNR of urothelial carcinoma to circumjacent bladder wall was significantly higher in excretory phase VMI40keV compared to venous phase CT. Subjective vessel contrast and delineation of primary tumor and distant metastases received equivalent or higher Likert scores in excretory phase VMI40keV than in venous phase CT. ConclusionThis feasibility study indicates that in the assessment of urothelial carcinoma, virtual monoenergetic excretory phase images at 40 keV acquired with spectral DECT could be feasible to maintain subjective and objective image quality as provided by conventional venous phase images. Still, equivalence with regards to metastatic lesion detection requires further investigation before employing this technique in a potential signal-scan, single-bolus approach.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call