Abstract
To prospectively compare the performance of extracellular space contrast agents (ECSCAs) versus a blood-pool contrast agent (BPCA) for a comprehensive lower-limb magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) protocol in patients with either claudication or critical ischaemia. Thirty patients with claudication underwent lower-limb magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) (dynamic crural, three-station bolus chase, and infra-inguinal high resolution) using a triphasic injection method with both a ECSCA and BPCA to allow intra-individual comparison, and 30 patients with critical ischaemia were scanned with either a ECSCA or BPCA. The dynamic, bolus chase, and high-resolution images were scored for quality on a Likert scale (from 1-5). Signal- and contrast-to-noise ratios were analysed and statistical analysis performed. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference between the ECSCAs and BPCA for arteriographic dynamic imaging, bolus chase MRA, or the high spatial resolution imaging. Venous image quality was rated higher quality for BPCA scans than for ECSCA images for calf veins (not significantly for thigh veins). Venous imaging signal intensity measures were higher for BPCA imaging. Extended-phase imaging using an ECSCA with this protocol provides arteriographic image quality equal to imaging with a BPCA. Venous depiction is good using ECSCAs with this approach, although better with BPCA.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
