Abstract

PurposeDual‐energy computed tomography (DECT) has been proposed for quantification of hepatic iron concentration (IC). However, the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) has not been established, limiting the clinical adoption of this technology. In this study, we aim to (a) establish the LLOQ using phantoms and (b) investigate the effects of patient size, dose level, energy combination, and reconstruction method.MethodsThree phantom sizes and eight vials of ferric nitrate solution with IC ranging from 0 to 10 mg/ml were used. DECT scans were performed at 80/140 and 100/140Sn kVp, and using five different levels of CT dose index (CTDI). An image‐domain three‐material‐decomposition algorithm was used to calculate the IC. The LLOQ was determined based on the coefficient of variation from repeated measurements.ResultsThe measured IC correlated strongly with the true IC in the small and medium phantoms (R2 of linear regression > 0.99) and moderately in the large phantom (0.8 < R2<0.9). The LLOQ improved with increased CTDI. At 30 mGy, the LLOQ was found to be 0.50/1.73/6.25 mg/ml in the small/medium/large phantoms, respectively. 80/140Sn kVp resulted in superior LLOQ for all phantom sizes compared to 100/140Sn kVp, primarily due to the difference in their iron enhancement ratios (1.94 and 1.55, respectively). Iterative reconstruction was found to further improve the LLOQ (by ~ 11%), whereas reconstruction kernel smoothness had negligible effect. The LLOQ of iron was significantly higher than that of iodine due to its lack of a useful k‐edge and lower enhancement ratio.ConclusionIron quantification at clinically important levels was achieved in a small‐ and a medium‐sized phantom using DECT, but proved challenging in a large phantom. Wide spectral separation and accurate calibration were found to be critical to the success of the technology.

Highlights

  • Iron overload can have significant clinical consequences

  • The relationship between the CT number and iron concentration (IC) could be adequately described by a linear function, and the parameters of the linear regression are given in the legends of Fig. 3

  • Iron overload is typically managed with iron chelation therapy, with the goal being to maintain hepatic IC in an optimal range of 18 to 38 μmol/g

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Iron overload can have significant clinical consequences. It may result from hereditary hemochromatosis or transfusional hemosiderosis.[1] The former affects approximately 1 in 300 Caucasians;[2] the latter occurs in patients with hematological disorders (e.g., thalassemia), who require repetitive blood transfusions. The performance of T2- and T2*-based methods is known to deteriorate at high IC.[7,9]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call