Lower costs of care, improved discharge disposition, and improved survival of advanced cancer patients (ACP) receiving early inpatient palliative care (PC) compared to standard oncologic care (SOC).

Abstract

11609 Background: Outpatient PC improves ACP symptom burdens, end-of-life care transitions, and mortality thereby enhancing quality of life. Yet, the financial implications, discharge disposition, and survival benefits of early, inpatient PC compared to SOC remains less understood. Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis of ACP receiving either PC or SOC between Jan 2015-Dec 2015 (N = 810). ACP cohorts were compared for demographics, costs, disposition, and survival. Financial costs collected included: fixed (overhead expenditures, facility maintenance, hospital property); variable (patient care supplies, diagnostic/therapeutic supplies, medications); operating (fixed, variable, breaking-even costs); direct (labor, materials, commissions, piece-rate wages, manufacturing supplies); indirect (production-supervision salaries, quality control, insurance, depreciation). Univariate and multivariate analyses were completed. Results: 468 were admitted to PC and 342 to SOC. Compared with SOC, PC were more likely to be: younger (61.1±13.2 v. 62.5±13.0, p = 0.02); African American (48% v. 36%, p = 0.0045); female (50% v. 40%, p = 0.005); and have shorter length of stay (5.7±4.9 v. 6.2±6.5, p = 0.01). PC had significantly less 30-day readmissions (16% v 23%, p = 0.03) and lower costs: direct ($9,478 v. $10,416, p = 0.01); indirect ($9,538 v. $10,999, p = 0.002); fixed ($10,308 v. $12,076, p = 0.001); variable ($8,709 v. $ 9,339, p = 0.02); operating ($19,017 v. $21,416, p = 0.003).Compared with SOC, ACP receiving PC were more likely to be discharged to: home (55% v.45%, p = 0.01); healthcare facilities (e.g. skilled nursing, inpatient rehabilitation) (36.1% v. 20%, p = 0.04); and hospice (home and inpatient) (7.7% v 5.8%, p = 0.02). PC had overall greater median survival from the time of discharge (106.8±99.95 v. 73.8±61.93, p = 0.03) compared to SOC. Conclusions: Early PC results in less financial strain, greater cost savings, and improved outcomes for younger and underserved inpatient ACP. Our results provide additional evidence for policies supporting that ACP access to routine PC must become a healthcare priority.