Abstract
Consumer-grade GPS units are a staple of modern field ecology, but the relatively large error radii reported by manufacturers (up to 10 m) ostensibly precludes their utility in measuring fine-scale movement of small animals such as insects. Here we demonstrate that for data collected at fine spatio-temporal scales, these devices can produce exceptionally accurate data on step-length and movement patterns of small animals. With an understanding of the properties of GPS error and how it arises, it is possible, using a simple field protocol, to use consumer grade GPS units to collect step-length data for the movement of small animals that introduces a median error as small as 11 cm. These small error rates were measured in controlled observations of real butterfly movement. Similar conclusions were reached using a ground-truth test track prepared with a field tape and compass and subsequently measured 20 times using the same methodology as the butterfly tracking. Median error in the ground-truth track was slightly higher than the field data, mostly between 20 and 30 cm, but even for the smallest ground-truth step (70 cm), this is still a signal-to-noise ratio of 3:1, and for steps of 3 m or more, the ratio is greater than 10:1. Such small errors relative to the movements being measured make these inexpensive units useful for measuring insect and other small animal movements on small to intermediate scales with budgets orders of magnitude lower than survey-grade units used in past studies. As an additional advantage, these units are simpler to operate, and insect or other small animal trackways can be collected more quickly than either survey-grade units or more traditional ruler/gird approaches.
Highlights
Movement ecology is developing into an important sub-discipline of ecology
Null vs. true steps in butterfly tracking data We found that with respect to the scale of real butterfly step-lengths, GPS error was very small, with the average null step-length being 0.378 m and a median null step-length of 0.11 m. 37% of null steps were 0.0 m, 80.3% of null steps were less than 0.25 m and 94.8% of null steps were less than 1 m
We are interested in the error relative to animal movement step-lengths, which are recorded by two GPS locations taken in quick succession (15 or 20 s, in this case)
Summary
Movement ecology is developing into an important sub-discipline of ecology. This new field has developed for several reasons. How to cite this article Breed and Severns (2015), Low relative error in consumer-grade GPS units make them ideal for measuring small-scale animal movement patterns. While this technological revolution has been taking place, or perhaps because of it, population and behavioral ecologists are becoming increasingly aware of the importance of understanding movement.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.