Low Recruitment in a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Ocrelizumab for Autoimmune Encephalitis: A Case Series and Review of Lessons Learned.

Abstract

IntroductionObservational data suggest that B-cell-depleting therapies are effective for antibody-mediated autoimmune encephalitis. However, randomized controlled trials are needed. Here, we report challenges encountered in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of ocrelizumab for autoimmune encephalitis that failed to meet recruitment goals.MethodsThis was a single-center, 12-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients with autoimmune encephalitis were randomized in 1:1 fashion to placebo or ocrelizumab infusion after receiving first-line immunotherapy. The primary endpoint of the study was clinical worsening, defined as a perceived decline by the patient or clinician or a decrease in the Lawton and Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL), along with either worsening on the Texas Functional Living Scale (TFLS) or hospitalization for symptoms of encephalitis.ResultsAmong 16 eligible patients, only three enrolled in the study, which closed due to poor recruitment. Two participants were randomized to the ocrelizumab arm and one to the placebo arm. The single patient in the placebo arm (NMDAR+) met the primary endpoint at 12 weeks and received open-label ocrelizumab with improvement. In the ocrelizumab arm, one participant (NMDAR+) demonstrated marked improvement, and the second (LGI1+) remained clinically stable. There were no serious adverse events associated with ocrelizumab.ConclusionClinical trial recruitment for autoimmune encephalitis is challenging, and our trial did not meet recruitment goals. Large, multicenter clinical trials are still needed, and careful attention must be given to study design, endpoints, and patient selection. Instrumented functional rating scales will be valuable outcome measures for future studies.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03835728.