Abstract

Substandard and falsified antimalarial and antibiotic medicines represent a serious problem for public health, especially in low- and middle-income countries. However, information on the prevalence of poor-quality medicines is limited. In the present study, samples of six antimalarial and six antibiotic medicines were collected from 31 health facilities and drug outlets in southern Malawi. Random sampling was used in the selection of health facilities. For sample collection, an overt approach was used in licensed facilities, and a mystery shopper approach in nonlicensed outlets. One hundred and fifty-five samples were analyzed by visual and physical examination and by rapid prescreening tests, that is, disintegration testing and thin-layer chromatography using the GPHF-Minilab. Fifty-six of the samples were analyzed according to pharmacopeial monographs in a World Health Organization-prequalified quality control laboratory. Seven out-of-specification medicines were identified. One sample was classified as falsified, lacking the declared active ingredients, and containing other active ingredients instead. Three samples were classified as substandard with extreme deviations from the pharmacopeial standards, and three further samples as substandard with nonextreme deviations. Of the substandard medicines, three failed in dissolution testing, two in the assay for the content of the active pharmaceutical ingredient, and one failed in both dissolution testing and assay. Six of the seven out-of-specification medicines were from private facilities. Only one out-of-specification medicine was found within the samples from public and faith-based health facilities. Although the observed presence of substandard and falsified medicines in Malawi requires action, their low prevalence in public and faith-based health facilities is encouraging.

Highlights

  • Access to “safe, effective, quality, and affordable essential medicines” has been included in the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations as Goal No 3.8.1 the occurrence of low-quality medicines continues to be a pervasive and poorly understood problem, especially in low- and middle-income countries.[2]

  • The spread of falsified medicines has been addressed as a “global pandemic,”[3] and alarming reports have been published on the possible scale and effects of this problem

  • The Malawi Essential Medicines Lists of 2009 and 2015 specify the level of health institution at which each medicine is normally permitted for use: only at central hospitals; or at both central and district hospitals; or on all levels of health-care facilities including health centers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Access to “safe, effective, quality, and affordable essential medicines” has been included in the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations as Goal No 3.8.1 the occurrence of low-quality medicines continues to be a pervasive and poorly understood problem, especially in low- and middle-income countries.[2]. Heymann and others[7] recently emphasized that “there is a dearth of high-quality, comprehensive data for the prevalence of substandard and falsified medicines.”. A systematic review[8] identified 179 full text articles on substandard and falsified medicines, yet only 44 of them measured the prevalence of such medicines (rather than presenting case reports, etc.), only 15 of these 44 articles met at least half of the quality assessment criteria defined in that systematic review, and just four of these studies used random sampling of the collection sites Heymann and others[7] recently emphasized that “there is a dearth of high-quality, comprehensive data for the prevalence of substandard and falsified medicines.” A systematic review[8] identified 179 full text articles on substandard and falsified medicines, yet only 44 of them measured the prevalence of such medicines (rather than presenting case reports, etc.), only 15 of these 44 articles met at least half of the quality assessment criteria defined in that systematic review, and just four of these studies used random sampling of the collection sites

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call