Abstract
ObjectiveThis paper examines the distribution, parameters, and determinants of safety net program use among a nationally representative sample of low-income children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). MethodsWe used data from the 2021 National Survey of Children’s Health to produce population estimates of material hardship and safety net program use among 554 low-income households of children with ASD, ages 3 to 17 years, relative to 2831 children with other special health care needs (SHCN) and 8758 children with no SHCN of the same age. Design-adjusted multivariate logistic regression models identified predictors of cash assistance, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and disconnection from both. ResultsThere were few significant differences in material hardship between children with ASD and those with other SHCN, although children with ASD experienced significantly higher levels of hardships compared to children with no SHCN. Having a child with ASD did not significantly increase the odds of safety net use. Health insurance and household income were stronger predictors of use than disability. Nine percent of disconnected children lived in households under 100% federal poverty level and experienced some type of material hardship. ConclusionsFuture research about the economic security of children with ASD and their families could focus on the following 3 areas of inquiry: assess how race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic position interact with disability to influence safety net program use; examine the intersection between Medicaid and safety net programs at the state and national levels; and identify specific subgroups of children at risk for disconnection and understand why they are not accessing benefits.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.