Abstract
The potential application of alkali-activated material (AAM) as an alternative binder in concrete to reduce the environmental impact of cement production has now been established. However, as the production and availability of the primarily utilized waste materials, such as fly Ash and blast furnace slag, decrease, it is necessary to identify alternative materials. One such material is clay, which contains aluminosilicates and is abundantly available across the world. However, the reactivity of untreated low-grade clay can be low. Calcination can be used to activate clay, but this can consume significant energy. To address this issue, this paper reports the investigation of two calcination methodologies, utilizing low-temperature and high-temperature regimes of different durations, namely 24 h heating at 120 °C and 5 h at 750 °C and, and the results are compared with those of the mechanical performance of the AAM produced with untreated low-grade clay. The investigation used two alkali dosages, 10% and 15%, with an alkali modulus varying from 1.0 to 1.75. An increase in strength was observed with calcination of the clay at both 120 and 750 °C compared to untreated clay. Specimens with a dosage of 10% showed enhanced performance compared to those with 15%, with Alkali Modulus (AM) of 1.0 giving the optimal strength at 28 days for both dosages. The strengths achieved were in the range 10 to 20 MPa, suitable for use as concrete masonry brick. The conversion of Al (IV) is identified as the primary factor for the observed increase in strength.
Highlights
Alkali-activated materials (AAMs) have come in to use as substitute materials for ordinary Portland cement (OPC) in the construction industry in recent years
This paper reports a study on the development of an alkali-activated clay mortar
A small decrease in the amorphous content was observed when heated to 750 ◦C; this may be due to recrystallization of the amorphous phase at this temperature [22,36]
Summary
Alkali-activated materials (AAMs) have come in to use as substitute materials for ordinary Portland cement (OPC) in the construction industry in recent years. The use of AAM limits the emissions of contaminants and consumes less energy and, can play a major role in reducing the global warming problem [1,2,3,4,5]. According to the reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [3,15], the growth of world cement production increased sevenfold by 2010 compared to that in 1970, and from 2000, this growth has been increasing sharply driven by demand from the construction industry. The IPCC has suggested using geopolymer concrete in place of OPC concrete to reduce CO2 emissions
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.