Abstract

Mapping axon diameters within the central and peripheral nervous system could play an important role in our understanding of nerve pathways, and help diagnose and monitor an array of neurological disorders. Numerous diffusion MRI methods have been proposed for imaging axon diameters, most of which use conventional single diffusion encoding (SDE) spin echo sequences. However, a growing number of studies show that oscillating gradient spin echo (OGSE) sequences can provide additional advantages over conventional SDE sequences. Recent theoretical results suggest that this is especially the case in realistic scenarios, such as when fibres have unknown or dispersed orientation. In the present study, we adopt the ActiveAx approach to experimentally investigate the extent of these advantages by comparing the performances of SDE and trapezoidal OGSE in viable nerve tissue. We optimise SDE and OGSE ActiveAx protocols for a rat peripheral nerve tissue and test their performance using Monte Carlo simulations and a 800 mT/m gradient strength pre-clinical imaging experiment. The imaging experiment uses excised sciatic nerve from a rat's leg placed in a MRI compatible viable isolated tissue (VIT) maintenance chamber, which keeps the tissue in a viable physiological state that preserves the structural complexity of the nerve and enables lengthy scan times. We compare model estimates to histology, which we perform on the nerve post scanning. Optimisation produces a three-shell SDE and OGSE ActiveAx protocol, with the OGSE protocol consisting of one SDE sequence and two low-frequency oscillating gradient waveform sequences. Both simulation and imaging results show that the OGSE ActiveAx estimates of the axon diameter index have a higher accuracy and a higher precision compared to those from SDE. Histology estimates of the axon diameter index in our nerve tissue samples are 4–5.8 μm and these are excellently matched with the OGSE estimates 4.2–6.5 μm, while SDE overestimates at 5.2–8 μm for the same sample. We found OGSE estimates to be more precise with on average a 0.5 μm standard deviation compared to the SDE estimates which have a 2 μm standard deviation. When testing the robustness of the estimates when the number of the diffusion gradient directions reduces, we found that both OGSE and SDE estimates are affected, however OGSE is more robust to these changes than the SDE. Overall, these results suggest, quantitatively and in in vivo conditions, that low-frequency OGSE sequences may provide improved accuracy of axon diameter mapping compared to standard SDE sequences.

Highlights

  • Developing a reliable technique to measure axon diameter in vivo is of great interest for our understanding of the human nervous system in both health and disease

  • Both oscillating gradient spin echo (OGSE) and single diffusion encoding (SDE) underestimate axon diameters for substrates with a large axon diameter index, which happens because the protocols are optimised for smaller diameters and their diffusion times are not long enough to probe large diameters

  • We have compared the performance of the OGSE ActiveAx method with the standard SDE ActiveAx method by comparing their ability to estimate axon diameters in tissue

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Developing a reliable technique to measure axon diameter in vivo is of great interest for our understanding of the human nervous system in both health and disease. Axon diameter has a direct effect on the speed of neural communication (Hursh, 1939; Ritchie, 1982) and varies in different regions of the central and peripheral nervous system. Axon sizes, if found to be abnormal, can indicate the presence of certain neurological diseases. The presence of swollen axons in the lumbar spinal cord has been linked to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, a degenerative disease of the central nervous system with an insidious onset (Sasaki and Maruyama, 1992; Cluskey and Ramsden, 2001). Measuring axon diameter in vivo can be of great importance for a wide range of applications

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call