Abstract
The effects of stimulus repetition rate on the H wave amplitude of intact and spinal cord injury patients were studied. Stimulus repetition rates ranging from 1 shock/10 sec to 10 shock/sec were employed. Each stimulus train consisted of twenty-five repetitive shocks. Summated responses were obtained by use of a computer of average transients and an X-Y plotter. In the intact subject, the H wave displayed a progressive reduction in amplitude at increasing rates of repetitive stimulation. The profile of depression in this frequency-amplitude series was similar to the low frequency depression that occurs in monosynaptic reflex pathways of anesthetized, decapitated and spinal animals when subjected to repetitive stimulation over the same frequency range. A variety of evidence is presented to suggest the same depressive phenomenon is operative in the H wave of man and the monosynaptic reflex of experimental animals. The H wave of spinal cord injury patients displayed virtually no low frequency depression on days of diminished spasticity. On days of heightened spasticity H wave amplitude was low and low frequency depression was evident. These results are thought compatible with the theory that low frequency depression is mediated by interneuronal circuits, including possibly the Renshaw cell system. These circuits would appear hypoactive on days of diminished spasticity and hyperactive on days of heightened spasticity. Evidence from a variety of sources is presented to support this theory.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.