Abstract

The low-frequency limit of the reflection coefficient for downstream-propagating sound in a cylindrical duct with uniform mean flow at a sudden hard–soft wall impedance transition is considered. The scattering at such a transition for arbitrary frequency was analysed by Rienstra (2007, J Eng Maths 59:451–475), who, having derived an exact analytic solution, also considered the plane-wave reflection coefficient, R 011, in the low-frequency limit, and it is this result that is reconsidered here. This reflection coefficient was shown to be significantly different with or without the application of a Kutta-like condition and the corresponding inclusion or exclusion of an instability wave over the impedance wall, assuming an impedance independent of frequency. This analysis is here rederived for a frequency-dependent locally-reacting impedance, and a dramatic difference is seen. In particular, the Kutta condition is shown to have no effect on R 011 in the low-frequency limit for impedances with Z(ω) ~ −ib/ω for some b > 0 as ω → 0, which includes the mass–spring–damper and Helmholtz resonator impedances, although, interestingly, not the enhanced Helmholtz resonator model. This casts doubt on the usefulness of the low-frequency plane-wave reflection coefficient as an experimental test for the presence of instability waves over the surface of impedance linings. The plane-wave reflection coefficient is also derived in the low-frequency limit for a thin shell boundary, based on the scattering analysis of Brambley and Peake (2008, J Fluid Mech 602:403–426), who suggested the model as a well-posed regularization of the mass–spring–damper impedance. The result might be interpretable as evidence for the nonexistence of an instability over an acoustic lining.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call