Abstract

The interactions between two octet baryons are studied at low energies using lattice quantum chromodynamics (LQCD) with larger-than-physical quark masses corresponding to a pion mass of ${m}_{\ensuremath{\pi}}\ensuremath{\sim}450\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{MeV}$ and a kaon mass of ${m}_{K}\ensuremath{\sim}596\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{MeV}$. The two-baryon systems that are analyzed range from strangeness $S=0$ to $S=\ensuremath{-}4$ and include the spin-singlet and triplet $NN$, $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}N$ ($I=3/2$), and $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Xi}}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Xi}}$ states, the spin-singlet $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}$ ($I=2$) and $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Xi}}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}$ ($I=3/2$) states, and the spin-triplet $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Xi}}N$ ($I=0$) state. The corresponding $s$-wave scattering phase shifts, low-energy scattering parameters, and binding energies when applicable are extracted using L\"uscher's formalism. While the results are consistent with most of the systems being bound at this pion mass, the interactions in the spin-triplet $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}N$ and $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Xi}}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Xi}}$ channels are found to be repulsive and do not support bound states. Using results from previous studies of these systems at a larger pion mass, an extrapolation of the binding energies to the physical point is performed and is compared with available experimental values and phenomenological predictions. The low-energy coefficients in pionless effective field theory (EFT) relevant for two-baryon interactions, including those responsible for $SU(3)$ flavor-symmetry breaking, are constrained. The $SU(3)$ flavor symmetry is observed to hold approximately at the chosen values of the quark masses, as well as the $SU(6)$ spin-flavor symmetry, predicted at large ${N}_{c}$. A remnant of an accidental $SU(16)$ symmetry found previously at a larger pion mass is further observed. The $SU(6)$-symmetric EFT constrained by these LQCD calculations is used to make predictions for two-baryon systems for which the low-energy scattering parameters could not be determined with LQCD directly in this study, and to constrain the coefficients of all leading $SU(3)$ flavor-symmetric interactions, demonstrating the predictive power of two-baryon EFTs matched to LQCD.

Highlights

  • Hyperons (Y) are expected to appear in the interior of neutron stars [1], and unless the strong interactions between hyperons and nucleons (N) are sufficiently repulsive, the equation of state (EoS) of dense nuclear matter will be softer than for purely nonstrange matter, leading to correspondingly lower maximum values for neutron star masses

  • Two analytical forms with different mπ dependence are used here to obtain the binding energies at the physical light-quark masses, using the results presented in Ref. [31] at mπ ∼ 806 MeV and those listed in Table VII for mπ ∼ 450 MeV, BlinðmπÞ 1⁄4 Bðli0nÞ þ Bðli1nÞmπ; BquadðmπÞ 1⁄4 Bðq0uÞad þ Bðq1uÞadm2π; ð23Þ ð24Þ

  • The first evidence for SUð16Þ symmetry in the two-(octet) baryon sector was observed in a lattice QCD (LQCD) study at a pion mass of ∼806 MeV [31], and the goal of the present study is to examine these predictions at smaller values of the light-quark masses

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Hyperons (Y) are expected to appear in the interior of neutron stars [1], and unless the strong interactions between hyperons and nucleons (N) are sufficiently repulsive, the equation of state (EoS) of dense nuclear matter will be softer than for purely nonstrange matter, leading to correspondingly lower maximum values for neutron star masses. Appendix D contains figures and tables that are omitted from the main body of the paper for clarity of presentation

Details of the LQCD computation
Low-lying finite-volume spectra of two baryons
Low-energy scattering phase shifts and effective-range parameters
Binding energies
Leading and next-to-leading order interactions in the EFT
Method
Compatibility with large-Nc predictions
Nc cð10Þ
CONCLUSIONS
Differences in the fitting strategy
Findings
Differences in the scattering parameters
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call