Abstract
The ability of concrete to attenuate ionizing radiation intensity is assessed using its linear or mass attenuation coefficient. In this work, the broad‐beam linear and mass attenuation coefficients of different types of soils and cements used for making concrete were measured at different photon energies (60–1333 keV), nearly spanning the diagnostic photon energy range, using a NaI detector. The mass attenuation coefficients of cement decreased from 0.133±0.002 at 60 keV to 0.047±0.003 at 1332.5 keV. For soils, the mass attenuation coefficient of those collected from the beach was the highest, decreasing from 0.176±0.003cm2/g at 60 keV to 0.054±0.001cm2/g at 1332.5 keV. Land soils had the least value, decreasing from 0.124±0.002cm2/g at 60 keV to 0.044±0.003cm2/g at 1332.5 keV. Limestone had smaller mass attenuation coefficients than the cement produced using it. The implication of the above is that for making concrete, beach sand should be preferred as the sand component of the concrete. Models of the form μL=A(E)exp[B(E)ρ] and μm=αln(E)+β are proposed for fitting the linear attenuation coefficient and mass attenuation coefficient data, respectively.PACS numbers: 87.55.N‐; 87.50.cm
Highlights
Many man-made sources of ionizing radiation abound in our technological age in addition to natural sources
One of the conditions for having narrow-beam geometry is that the collimation of the source should be large enough just to cover the detector uniformly, thereby minimizing the number of scattered photons.[9]. A second condition is that both the source and attenuator should be placed at a far distance from the detector, again to minimize scattered radiations that get to the detector
Beach soil had the highest mass attenuation coefficient value, decreasing from 0.176 ± 0.003 g/cm3 at 60 keV to 0.054 ± 0.001 cm3/g 1332.5 keV, while land soils had the least value of all the energies, decreasing from 0.124 ± 0.002 g/cm3 at 60 keV to 0.044 ± 0.0003 cm3/g at 1332.5 keV
Summary
Many man-made sources of ionizing radiation abound in our technological age in addition to natural sources. These ionizing radiations have found applications in many areas including medicine, industry, research, and agriculture.[1] In all these areas of applications, the use of ionizing radiation sources has been found to produce benefits but not without some detriment associated with their use. The determination of attenuation coefficients can be done using either narrowbeam or broad-beam geometry. Secondary radiation includes radiation scattered from or produced within the patient and other objects.[11,12] The use of broad-beam for the determination of attenuation coefficients of materials that are used in construction of protective barriers against radiation is desirable
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.