Low-dose immune tolerance induction for severe hemophilia A inhibitor patients: Immunosuppressants are generally not necessary for inhibitor-titer below 200 BU/mL.

Abstract

It remained unclear that the efficacy comparison between low-dose immune tolerance induction (LD-ITI) incorporating immunosuppressants (IS) when severe hemophilia A (SHA) patients had inhibitor-titer ≥200 Bethesda Units (BU)/mL (LD-ITI-IS200 regimen) and LD-ITI combining with IS when SHA patients had inhibitor-titer ≥40 BU/mL (LD-ITI-IS40 regimen). To compare the efficacy of the LD-ITI-IS200 regimen with that of the LD-ITI-IS40 regimen for SHA patients with high-titer inhibitors. A prospective cohort study on patients receiving LD-ITI-IS200 compared to those receiving LD-ITI-IS40 from January 2021 to December 2023. Both received LD-ITI [FVIII 50 IU/kg every other day]. IS (rituximab + prednisone) was added when peak inhibitor tier ≥200 BU/mL in the LD-ITI-IS200 regimen and ≥40 BU/mL in the LD-ITI-IS40 regimen. Success is defined as a negative inhibitor plus FVIII recovery ≥66% of the expected. We enrolled 30 patients on LD-ITI-IS200 and 64 patients on LD-ITI-IS40, with similar baseline clinical characteristics. A lower IS-use rate was discovered in the LD-ITI-IS200 regimen compared to the LD-ITI-IS40 regimen (30.0% vs. 62.5%). The two regimens (LD-ITI-IS200 vs. LD-ITI-IS40) had similar success rate (70.0% vs. 79.7%), median time to success (9.4 vs. 10.6 months), and annualized bleeding rate during ITI (3.7 vs. 2.8). The cost to success was lower for LD-ITI-IS200 than for LD-ITI-IS40 (2107 vs. 3256 US Dollar/kg). Among patients with peak inhibitor-titer 40-199 BU/mL, 10 non-IS-using (on LD-ITI-IS200 regimen) and 28 IS-using (on LD-ITI-IS40 regimen) had similar success rates (70.0% vs. 78.6%) and time to success (9.0 vs. 8.8 months). In LD-ITI, IS are not necessary for inhibitor titer <200 BU/mL.