Abstract

BackgroundLow-dose emicizumab can potentially offer a cost-effective treatment option in persons with hemophilia A, especially in developing countries. ObjectivesTo compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose emicizumab with those on low-dose factor (F)VIII prophylaxis via chart review. MethodsAfter ethics approval, chart data of 2 groups of patients were reviewed: group 1 (low-dose emicizumab, n = 10; 3 mg/kg monthly without a loading dose) and group 2 (low-dose FVIII prophylaxis, n = 10; 10-20 IU/kg of FVIII concentrates twice a week). Outcomes were target joints, annual bleeding rate, annual joint bleeding rate, Hemophilia Joint Health Score, nonactivated thromboelastometry–rotational thromboelastometry clotting time, plasma emicizumab levels, and direct costs of treatment. ResultsAll outcome measures were significantly better in the low-dose emicizumab group than in the low-dose FVIII prophylaxis group. For nonactivated thromboelastometry–rotational thromboelastometry, median values after 6 months in the low-dose emicizumab group were comparable with values seen in patients with mild hemophilia, while the values in the low-dose FVIII prophylaxis group were similar to those of patients with moderate hemophilia. The direct cost of low-dose emicizumab was found to be approximately US $6000 and that for low-dose recombinant FVIII prophylaxis used in our study was US $6282 (the cost may range from US $3432 to $7920 depending on the type of factor) when compared to approximately US $15 000 for standard-dose emicizumab. ConclusionLow-dose emicizumab offers a cost-effective treatment option and can improve access in developing countries. These findings need to be confirmed in a larger and better-controlled study.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call