Abstract

Cerebral radiation necrosis (RN), a complication of Gamma Knife radiosurgery, is difficult to treat, although bevacizumab seems to be effective. However, clinical data pertaining to bevacizumab treatment for RN are scarce, and its high price is problematic. This study explored the effectiveness of low-dose bevacizumab for RN caused by Gamma Knife. We retrospectively analyzed 22 patients who suffered cerebral RN post-Gamma Knife, and received bevacizumab treatment because of the poor efficacy of glucocorticoids. Low-dose bevacizumab (3 mg/kg) was administered for two cycles at 2-week intervals. T1- and T2-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images were examined for changes in RN status. We also monitored the dose of glucocorticoid, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score, and adverse drug reactions. The mean volume of RN lesions decreased by 45% on T1-weighted images with contrast enhancement, and by 74% on T2-weighted images. All patients discontinued the use of glucocorticoids. According to the KPS scores, all patients showed an improvement in their symptoms and neurological function. No side effects were observed. Low-dosage bevacizumab at a dose of 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks is effective for treating cerebral RN after Gamma knife for brain metastases.

Highlights

  • Gamma Knife, a type of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), is effective for local control of brain metastases [1]

  • We evaluated the efficacy of lowdosage bevacizumab treatment for radiation necrosis (RN) following Gamma Knife in patients with brain metastases

  • We analyzed 22 patients treated with bevacizumab for cerebral RN, caused by Gamma Knife in our center, between January 2013 and December 2017 (Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Gamma Knife, a type of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), is effective for local control of brain metastases [1]. Gamma Knife leads to the intractable complication of radiation necrosis (RN) [2]. Glucocorticoids are the standard treatment for cerebral RN, in spite of their adverse side effects and limited treatment efficacy [3]. The efficacy of other non-invasive treatments, including antiplatelet, anticoagulation and hyperbaric oxygenation, is considered controversial [1, 2, 4, 5]. Surgical management can relieve clinical symptoms due to removal of the mass and reduced intracranial hypertension; surgery carries risks and causes neurological damage [6].

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call