Abstract

Since the release of the first Kinect in 2011, low-cost technologies for upper-limb evaluation has been employed frequently for rehabilitation purposes. However, a limited number of studies have assessed the potential of the Kinect V2 for motor evaluations. In this paper, a simple biomechanical protocol has been developed, in order to assess the performances of healthy people and patients, during daily-life reaching movements, with focus on some of the patients’ common compensatory strategies. The assessment considers shoulder range of motion, elbow range of motion, trunk compensatory strategies, and movement smoothness. Seventy-seven healthy people and twenty post-stroke patients participated to test the biomechanical assessment. The testing protocol included four different experimental conditions: (1) dominant limb and (2) non-dominant limb of 77 healthy people, and (3) the more impaired limb of 20 post-stroke hemiparetic patients, and (4) the less-impaired limb of 11 patients (subgroup of the original 20). Biomechanical performances of the four groups were compared. Results showed that the dominant and non-dominant limbs of healthy people had comparable performances (p > 0.05). On the contrary, condition (3) showed statistically significant differences between the healthy dominant/non-dominant limb and the less-affected limb in hemiparetic patients, for all parameters of assessment (p < 0.001). In some cases, the less-affected limb of the patients also showed statistical differences (p < 0.05), with respect to the healthy people. Such results suggest that Kinect V2 has the potential for being employed at home, laboratory or clinical environment, for the evaluation of patients’ motor performances.

Highlights

  • The evaluation of motor performances of neurological patients is a common practice in clinical environment [1]

  • All patients could perform the complete clinical trial, each one according to his motor functionality

  • Post-hoc tests (Matlab multcompare) revealed that the mean of the Patients More-Affected Limb group was different from one of the Results related to Elbow Extension Angle are reported

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The evaluation of motor performances of neurological patients is a common practice in clinical environment [1]. Clinical scales are surveys and questionnaires that associate a score to specific performances, related to motor and cognitive aspects [2,3]. Despite providing a wide variety of assessments, clinical scales are inter- and extra-operator dependent, have intrinsic low sensibility, and suffer of ceiling and floor effects [4,5]. A deeper and quantitative assessment can be achieved with motion analysis or wearable sensors, which are some of the main techniques used in clinics to assess the motor capabilities of neurological patients. The clinical status and the effects of therapies can be evaluated in terms of motor performances, Sensors 2019, 19, 1224; doi:10.3390/s19051224 www.mdpi.com/journal/sensors

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.