Abstract

BackgroundContinuous monitoring of central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) has been proposed as a prognostic indicator in several pathological conditions, including cardiac diseases, sepsis, trauma. To our knowledge, no studies have evaluated ScvO2 in polytraumatized patients with brain injury so far. Thus, the aim of the present study was to assess the prognostic role of ScvO2 monitoring during first 24 hours after trauma in this patients' population.MethodsThis prospective, non-controlled study, carried out between April 2006 and March 2008, was performed in a higher level Trauma Center in Florence (Italy). In the study period, 121 patients affected by major brain injury after major trauma were recruited. Inclusion criteria were: 1. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≤ 13; 2. an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 15. Exclusion criteria included: 1. pregnancy; 2. age < 14 years; 3. isolated head trauma; 4. death within the first 24 hours from the event; 5. the lack of ScvO2 monitoring within 2 hours from the trauma. Demographic and clinical data were collected, including Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), Simplified Acute Physiologic Score II (SAPS II), Marshall score. The worst values of lactate and ScvO2 within the first 24 hours from trauma, ICU length of stay (LOS), and 28-day mortality were recorded.ResultsPatients who deceased within 28 days showed higher age (53 ± 16.6 vs 43.8 ± 19.6, P = 0.043), ISS core (39.3 ± 14 vs 30.3 ± 10.1, P < 0.001), AIS score for head/neck (4.5 ± 0.7 vs 3.4 ± 1.2, P = 0.001), SAPS II score (51.3 ± 14.1 vs 42.5 ± 15, P = 0.014), Marshall Score (3.5 ± 0.7 vs 2.3 ± 0.7, P < 0.001) and arterial lactate concentration (3.3 ± 1.8 vs 6.7 ± 4.2, P < 0.001), than survived patients, whereas ScvO2 resulted significantly lower (66.7% ± 11.9 vs 70.1% ± 8.9 vs, respectively; P = 0.046). Patients with ScvO2 values ≤ 65% also showed higher 28-days mortality rate (31.3% vs 13.5%, P = 0.034), ICU LOS (28.5 ± 15.2 vs 16.6 ± 13.8, P < 0.001), and total hospital LOS (45.1 ± 20.8 vs 33.2 ± 24, P = 0.046) than patients with ScvO2 > 65%.ConclusionScvO2 value less than 65%, measured in the first 24 hours after admission in patients with major trauma and head injury, was associated with higher mortality and prolonged hospitalization.

Highlights

  • Continuous monitoring of central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) has been proposed as a prognostic indicator in several pathological conditions, including cardiac diseases, sepsis, trauma

  • Patients who deceased within 28 days showed higher age (53 ± 16.6 vs 43.8 ± 19.6, P = 0.043), Injury Severity Score (ISS) core (39.3 ± 14 vs 30.3 ± 10.1, P < 0.001), Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score for head/neck (4.5 ± 0.7 vs 3.4 ± 1.2, P = 0.001), SAPS simplified acute physiology score II (II) score (51.3 ± 14.1 vs 42.5 ± 15, P = 0.014), Marshall Score (3.5 ± 0.7 vs 2.3 ± 0.7, P < 0.001) and arterial lactate concentration (3.3 ± 1.8 vs 6.7 ± 4.2, P < 0.001), than survived patients, whereas ScvO2 resulted significantly lower (66.7% ± 11.9 vs 70.1% ± 8.9 vs, respectively; P = 0.046)

  • ScvO2 value less than 65%, measured in the first 24 hours after admission in patients with major trauma and head injury, was associated with higher mortality and prolonged hospitalization

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Continuous monitoring of central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) has been proposed as a prognostic indicator in several pathological conditions, including cardiac diseases, sepsis, trauma. Organ and tissue damages caused by a trauma impact lead to the development of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) [1]. Continuous monitoring of central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) has been proposed as an indicator of tissue hypoperfusion. The reliability of ScvO2, compared with mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2), is still under discussion, under shock conditions [3], the prognostic importance of low level (≤ 65%) of ScvO2 has been highlighted in severe sepsis [4,5], myocardial infarction [6], cardiac failure [7], and trauma [8]. ScvO2 can be monitored with a central venous line, whereas SvO2 requires a pulmonary artery catheterization

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call