Love and Politics in the Contemporary Spanish American Novel (review)

Abstract

Gonzalez, anibal. Love and Politics Contemporary Spanish American Novel. Austin: U of Texas P, 2010. ix + 177 pp.The Latin American literary Boom holds such sway over critics and readers alike that, its wake, many of both have been left scrambling to invent categories in which we try to trap amazing diversity of human textual endeavors (Gonzalez 144). Anibal Gonzalez sets out to provide a canonizing poetics for what he calls the new sentimental novel, a literary mode that has no history, his admirable study Love and Politics Contemporary Spanish American Novel. His success turns on one's definition of literature.A poetics is stamp of legitimacy and history that spells success for a literary tradition. A case point is Latin American literature as a whole. The commercial and critical successes of Boom put Latin American literature, whose legitimacy and authenticity had been question main, on world map. Gonzalez realizes that, although these total novels did not have an Aristotle or a de Rougemont behind them, they did have a Borges with New Yorker and a Balcells Barcelona. He realizes that for a literary mode to be accepted within canon, it must have imprimatur of establishment of critics, and this is precisely what he intends to do for some contemporary works and writers who, by his own suggestion, are usually on outskirts (2) and hold an ambiguous place canon (40).This is why main intertext Gonzalez's work is Denis de Rougemont's L'amour et l'Occident, originally published 1939 Love Western World is 1956 English translation). This classic study centers on medieval Romance of Tristan and Isolde, languishes on medieval Provencal courtly love, and ultimately provides a typology of amorous experience which has led to formulation of two opposing concepts of love Western tradition: eros and agape (13). Today's readers of Latin American literature might balk at first at seeing a preoccupation with such chronologically distant and seemingly far-afield literary criticism, especially light of prosaic short shrift (relegated to footnotes) Gonzalez usually gives here to more contemporary and apposite studies (feminist criticism, for example), and of contemporary body of theory and criticism that has shifted, if not broken altogether, polarized paradigm of eros-agape (queer theory, to name one approach). After all, one of Gonzalez's goals is to enfranchise, if not ensconce, this new modality he identifies within a modern literary history. However, what de Rougemont's study does for sentimental novel is what Dante's De vulgar i eloquentia did for European vernacular literatures: it provides credible antecedents and ancestors, even if model seems forced at times and does not always align well with more contemporary paradigms.Gonzalez introduces Miguel Barnet's Cancion de Rachel and Elena Poniatowska's Querido Diego as origins of new Spanish American sentimental narrative. Chapter one is devoted to Isabel Allende's rupture with testimonio De amor y de sombra. In chapter two, Gonzalez focuses on Alfredo Bryce Echenique as founding figure of new sentimental narrative. Chapter three looks at effects of both testimonial and sentimental narratives on celebrated Boom writers, such as Garcia Marquez. While chapter four studies how Laura Esquivel's Como agua para chocolate, Luis Sepulveda's Un viejo que leia novelas de amor, and Marcela Serrano's Nosotras que nos queremos tanto keep mass media and discourse of passion at arm's length, chapter five's focus on Antonio Skarm eta's Love-Fifteen and Luis Rafael Sanchez's La importancia de llamarse Daniel Santos is more accepting of these discourses.Sentimentalism itself has often been derided by modern literary critics, but Gonzalez argues that it has a deeper motivation: the turn to love . …