Abstract

We address a variant of the single item lot sizing problem affected by proportional storage (or inventory) losses and uncertainty in the product demand. The problem has applications in, among others, the energy sector, where storage losses (or storage deteriorations) are often unavoidable and, due to the need for planning ahead, the demands can be largely uncertain. We first propose a two-stage robust optimization approach with second-stage storage variables, showing how the arising robust problem can be solved as an instance of the deterministic one. We then consider a two-stage approach where not only the storage but also the production variables are determined in the second stage. After showing that, in the general case, solutions to this problem can suffer from acausality (or anticipativity), we introduce a flexible affine rule approach which, albeit restricting the solution set, allows for causal production plans. A hybrid robust-stochastic approach where the objective function is optimized in expectation, as opposed to in the worst-case, while retaining robust optimization guarantees of feasibility in the worst-case, is also discussed. We conclude with an application to heat production, in the context of which we compare the different approaches via computational experiments on real-world data.

Highlights

  • Lot Sizing (LS) is a fundamental problem in a large part of modern production planning systems

  • We have considered a variant of the lot sizing problem with storage losses subject to demand uncertainty

  • We have developed two two-stage robust optimization approaches, both with first-stage set-up variables, one with second-stage storage variables but first-stage production variables, and another one in which production and storage variables are both second-stage

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Lot Sizing (LS) is a fundamental problem in a large part of modern production planning systems. We focus on a variant of LS where the storage suffers from proportional losses and the product demands are subject to uncertainty.1 This variant suits the case of many applications in the energy sector where a small portion of the energy that is stored is lost over time and the demands (of, e.g., heat, as in the application that we will consider) are often not known in advance. After showing that solutions to this problem may be acausal (or anticipative), i.e., that they may contain production variables whose value, at time t, can only be determined by knowing the realization of the demand at time t > t, we introduce an affine rule approach This technique, restricting the solution set, allows for causal production plans.

Deterministic LS
LS with uncertain demands
The problem
The deterministic case
The uncertain case
Robust LS with first-stage production and second-stage storage
Robust LS with second-stage production and storage variables
Affine decision rules
A regularization approach
Hybrid robust-stochastic approach
Computational results
Instances and setup
Realized robustness
Computational study
A note on computing times
Comparison of the best methods
Concluding remarks
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call