Abstract

Some historical aspects on late lessons from early warnings on cancer risks with lost time for prevention are discussed. One current example is the cancer-causing effect from radiofrequency (RF) radiation. Studies since decades have shown increased human cancer risk. The fifth generation, 5G, for wireless communication is about to be implemented world-wide despite no comprehensive investigations of potential risks to human health and the environment. This has created debate on this technology among concerned people in many countries. In an appeal to EU in September 2017, currently endorsed by more than 400 scientists and medical doctors, a moratorium on the 5G deployment was required until proper scientific evaluation of negative consequences has been made (www.5Gappeal.eu). That request has not been taken seriously by EU. Lack of proper unbiased risk evaluation of the 5G technology makes adverse effects impossible to be foreseen. This disregard is exemplified by the recent report from the International Commission on non-ionizing radiation protection (ICNIRP) whereby only thermal (heating) effects from RF radiation are acknowledged despite a large number of reported non-thermal effects. Thus, no health effects are acknowledged by ICNIRP for non-thermal RF electromagnetic fields in the range of 100kHz-300GHz. Based on results in three case-control studies on use of wireless phones we present preventable fraction for brain tumors. Numbers of brain tumors of not defined type were found to increase in Sweden, especially in the age group 20-39 years in both genders, based on the Swedish Inpatient Register. This may be caused by the high prevalence of wireless phone use among children and in adolescence taking a reasonable latency period and the higher vulnerability to RF radiation among young persons.

Highlights

  • The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) at the World Health Organization (WHO) initiated in 1969 a program to evaluate human cancer risks of chemicals

  • Lack of proper unbiased risk evaluation of the 5G technology makes adverse effects impossible to be foreseen. This disregard is exemplified by the recent report from the International Commission on non-ionizing radiation protection (ICNIRP) whereby only thermal effects from RF radiation are acknowledged despite a large number of reported nonthermal effects

  • In 2011 radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) in the frequency range 30 kHz–300 GHz were evaluated by IARC at WHO to be possibly carcinogenic to humans, Group 2B [62, 63]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) at the World Health Organization (WHO) initiated in 1969 a program to evaluate human cancer risks of chemicals. It had previously been evaluated in 1977 by IARC to be a possibly human carcinogen, Group 2B [42] This was about two decades after the first epidemiological publications on increased cancer risk for TCDD contaminated herbicides. In 2011 radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) in the frequency range 30 kHz–300 GHz were evaluated by IARC at WHO to be possibly carcinogenic to humans, Group 2B [62, 63] This was based on evidence of increased risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma in human epidemiology studies on use of mobile and/or cordless phone (DECT) [64,65,66,67,68,69]. APC, annual percentage change (APC , time from to first joinpoint; APC , time from first joinpoint to or to second joinpoint; APC , time from second joinpoint to ); AAPC, average annual percentage change

Discussion
Findings
92. Bioinitiative

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.